Monetary executions: an analysis of atypical coercive measures against the debtor's fundamental rights
Abstract
The present work aims to analyze the use of atypical coercive measures in the protection of pecuniary obligations, expressly provided for in article 139, item IV, of CPC/2015. It is true that the absence of parameters for the application of atypical coercive measures against the debtor's fundamental rights brings concerns regarding their limits, effectiveness and constitutionality. From this perspective, this work aims to analyze the current regulation of atypical measures and also demonstrate the limits, application and effectiveness that must be followed by magistrates so that there is harmony with the constitucional text (fundamental rights). This work was supported by a theoretical methodology (bibliographic and legislative) that seeks to analyze doctrinal understandings based on current legislation. In view of the study, it is evident that atypical coercive measures are of great relevance to the enforcement process and can be used in certain specific cases. Therefore, it was found that the atypical measures in pecuniary executions are constitutional and can be applied within their constitutional limitations.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Declaro que o presente trabalho é original, não tendo sido submetido à publicação em qualquer outro periódico nacional ou internacional, quer seja em parte ou em sua totalidade. Declaro, ainda, que uma vez publicado na Revista, editada pelo Centro Universitário FACEX - UNIFACEX, o mesmo jamais será submetido por mim ou por qualquer um dos demais coautores a qualquer outro periódico. Através deste instrumento, em meu nome e em nome dos demais coautores, caso existam, cedo os direitos autorais do referido trabalho ao UNIFACEX e declaro estar ciente de que a não observância deste compromisso submeterá o infrator a sanções e penas previstas na Lei Ordinária Federal nº 9.610, de 19 de fevereiro de 1998 (Lei dos Direitos Autorais).
